SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.SREEDHARAN, C.N.B.NAIR
Hindustan Zinc Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Sridharan,S.P. Rao

ORDER

Per Justice K. Sreedharan :

Appellant is a Public Sector Undertaking. The main produce manufactured by the appellant is zinc. In the process of manufacture of zinc, they get silver chloride as a bye product. The generation of silver chloride as a bye product was not revealed to the Department of Excise. Nor was duty paid on that product. Therefore, nine show-cause-notices were issued by the Jurisdictional Assistant Collectors, each covering periods less than six months invoking provisions contained in main Section 11 A. Total duty demanded under the above mentioned nine show cause notice came to Rs. 1,62,56,434/-.

2. Appellant disputed the claim put forth by the Department in the above mentioned nine show cause notices. They also claimed benefit of Notification No. 217/86-CE dated 2.4.86. Adjudicating Authority, namely, Commissioner negatived that point raised by the appellant and confirmed the duty demanded in the show cause notices totalling Rs. 1,62,56,434/-. The order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, namely, Order-in-Original No. 5/CE/JP-II/2000 dated 18.1.2000 is under challenge. This Tribunal by Final Order No. 761/99-C dated 24.8.99[reported in 1999 (35) RLT 245] too

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top