SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T.P.NAMBIAR, V.K.ASHTANA
Sonarome Chemicals (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, B’Lore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.G. Raghavan,Ravinder Saroop

ORDER

Per Shri V.K. Asthana :

This is an appeal filed by the appellants against the orders passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore in Order-in-Original No. 77 dt. 17.9.93. In the said order, the Ld. Collector has confirmed the payment of duty amounting to Rs. 4,15,445.85 under proviso to section 11A and imposed of penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the appellants after holding that they are not eligible for the benefit of notification No. 230/86 dt. 3.4.86 for the clearance of certain Industrial Flavour and Fragrance falling under sub-heading 3302.00 which they had claimed to have been manufactured without aid of power but which was held to have been manufactured with the aid of power.

2. It is not disputed that the only use of power is to operate certain laboratory equipments to test both quality of the raw materials received and the end product produced. The equipment in question used for such testing is as follows :-

a) Spectrometer

b) P.H. Meter

c) Vaccum Pump

d) Distillation apparatus

e) Water purifier

f) Pouch sealer

3. Briefly the arguments of the Ld. advocate Shri K.G. Raghavan representing the appellants were as follows:-

i) The wordings of the exemption contained in noti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top