SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.A.BRAHMA DEVA, J.H.JOGLEKAR
Hindalco Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Nambirajan,Jangir Singh

ORDER

Per G.A. Brahma Deva :

These are six appeals filed by the appellants involving a common issue and therefore they are clubbed together and are being disposed of by this common order. The dispute is in respect of denial of modvat credit. Modvat credit has been denied on the following inputs on the ground that either they are not directly used in the manufacture of finished product or in some cases they were used as a part of the machinery and since the machinery is not entitled to modvat credit, the benefit cannot be extended to the parts.

2. Shri R. Nambirajan, Advocate appearing for the appellants in all these cases submitted that total 12 items are involved. These are:

1. Arthracite Based Carbon Block/Graphite Block.

2. Carbon Electrode Paste.

3. Activated Carbon.

4. Acilol - 1214.

5. Indwool Ceramic Fibre Roll

6. Styrite Board

7. Sifton-H

8. Indion NIP

9. Poly Alum Chloride

10. Glass Filter Cloth

11. Sodium Sulphite/Alfloc

12. Cathode Block.

He explained the process of manufacture and how particular item is used in respect of initial product and the details of explanation is as follows :-

1. ANTHRACITE BASED CARBON BLOCK/GRAPHITE BLOCK

The aluminium metal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top