SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
U.L. BHAT, K.S. VENKATARAMANI, LAJJA RAM, JJ.
Union Carbide India Ltd., Calcutta -Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta-1 -Respondent
Final Order Nos. 1487 to 1502/96-NB Appeal Nos. E/21/88-NB, E/737/90, 601/90, 19/91-NB E/1713-1714/94-NB, 1435/95-NB, 2489/94-NB E/1244/89-NB, 1116/95-NB, E/49/92, 106/92-NB E/901/92-NB, E/865/93-NB , 1487 of 1996, 1502 of 1996, 21 of 1988, 737 of 1990, 601 of 1990, 19 of 1991, 1713 of 1994, 1714 of 1994, 1435 of 1995, 2489 of 1994, 1244 of 1989, 1116 of 1995, 49 of 1992, 106 of 1992, 901 of 1992, 865 of 1993, 866 of 1993, 332 of 1994
Decided On : 04-06-1996

Advocates Appeared:
V. Lakshmikumaran, R.C. Gupta, S.K. Bagaria, K.K. Kapoor, T. Gunasekaran, G. Prabhakara Sastry,Sanjeev Sachdeva

ORDER

Per Justice U.L. Bhat: These appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order as they involve common questions of law. The appeals E.601/90, E.737/90 and E. 19/91 were referred to a larger Bench by the Western Regional Bench by an order reported in 1993 (68) ELT 452. This was followed by reference of appeal E.49/92 by the Eastern Regional Bench by an order reported in 1993 (68) ELT 603. The other appeals were referred by brief orders. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the various appellants Shriyuts Lakshmi Kumaran, R.C. Gupta, Arun Mehta, S.K. Bagaria, K.K. Kapoor, T. Gunasekaran, G. Prabhakara Sastry, C. Willingdon and the Senior Departmental Representative, Sri Sanjeev Sachdeva.

2.The respondent in Appeal E.332/94 and the appellants in other appeals are manufacturers of excisable final products. They availed modvat credit in respect of certain goods claimed as inputs as defined in Rule 57A of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The jurisdictional Assistant Collectors disallowed modvat credit. In the case relating to appeal E.332/94, the Collector (Appeals) set aside the order, holding that the respondent was entitled to benefit of modvat credit while the Collectors (Appeal) in the other cases confirmed the orders disallowing the benefit of modvat credit. In a few of the cases, modvat credit was disallowed on the ground that the goods in respect of which credit was claimed were spare parts of machinery which attract the exclusion clause (i) of explanation to sub-rule (1) of Rule 57A of the orders. In some of the cases, it was held that the goods claimed to be inputs were not used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The Collector (Appeals) took the contrary view in one of the cases as indicated already.

3. The particulars of the cases are as follows:-

Appeal No. Period   Input   Output   Appellant
E.21/88. July 1987. Spares of Dry Cell Union Carbide
 machines. batteries. India Ltd.
E.601/90. Jan. 1988 to  Dryer felt,  Paper.  B.K. Paper
June 1989.  Phosper Bronze,   Mills.
 Metal cloth.    
E.737/90. July 1989      
to Sept. 1989.  -do- -do- -do-
E.19/91. Oct. 1989      
to Dec. 1989.  -do- -do- -do-
E. 1714/94. 1.4.93 to Cotton Felts, -do-  Ballarpur
30.6.93.  Woollen Felts, Synthetic Felts.   Industries.
E. 1713/94. 1.7.93 to 31.12.93. -do- -do- -do-
E.2489/94. January      
and Feb. 1994.  -do- -do- -do-
E. 1435/94. March to      
July 1994.  -do- -do- -do-
E. 1244/89. With effect Endless Duplex M/s. Rollat-
from  wire cloth Board Kraft ainers Ltd.
1.3.87.  Endless Paper.  
 wire mesh Endless felts.    
E.49/92. September Felts, Paper and Orient Paper
1989.  Bronzemetal cloth, wire cloth, Dandy cloth. paper Board.  Mills.
E. 106/92. October      
1989  -do- -do- -do-
E. 1901/92. May 1989 Copper wire. Metal  
to May 1991.   container.  
E. 865/93. Sept. 1992 Woollen  Kraft paper Remco Paper
to Oct.  felt, wire  and Paper and Board.
1992.  mesh.  Board.  
E. 1866/92. August 1992 Woollen Kraft paper  Kwality Pulp
to Sept.  felt, wire and Paper  and Paper
1992.  mesh.  Board.  Mills.
E.332/94.  -do- Kraft Paper. C.C.E. Visak-hapatnam.
E.1116/95. Sept. 1993 Endless Duplex Rollatainers.
to December 1993.  felts, Endless wire cloth. Board.  

4. Resolution of the controversy in these appeals depends on the correct understanding of provisions of Rule 57A relating to Modvat Credit Scheme. The scheme enables manufacturers of specified final products to avail credit of specified duty paid on specified goods (referred to as "inputs"") used in or in relation to the manufacture of the said final products and to utilise such credit towards payment of excise duty leviable on the final products under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (for short, the Act) or under any other Act as may be specified. The provision is subject to the provisions of the other Rules in the section and the conditions and restrictions that may be specified. Relevant port

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top