CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
U.L. BHAT, K.S. VENKATARAMANI, LAJJA RAM, JJ.
Union Carbide India Ltd., Calcutta -Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta-1 -Respondent
Final Order Nos. 1487 to 1502/96-NB Appeal Nos. E/21/88-NB, E/737/90, 601/90, 19/91-NB E/1713-1714/94-NB, 1435/95-NB, 2489/94-NB E/1244/89-NB, 1116/95-NB, E/49/92, 106/92-NB E/901/92-NB, E/865/93-NB , 1487 of 1996, 1502 of 1996, 21 of 1988, 737 of 1990, 601 of 1990, 19 of 1991, 1713 of 1994, 1714 of 1994, 1435 of 1995, 2489 of 1994, 1244 of 1989, 1116 of 1995, 49 of 1992, 106 of 1992, 901 of 1992, 865 of 1993, 866 of 1993, 332 of 1994
Decided On : 04-06-1996
Per Justice U.L. Bhat: These appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order as they involve common questions of law. The appeals E.601/90, E.737/90 and E. 19/91 were referred to a larger Bench by the Western Regional Bench by an order reported in 1993 (68) ELT 452. This was followed by reference of appeal E.49/92 by the Eastern Regional Bench by an order reported in 1993 (68) ELT 603. The other appeals were referred by brief orders. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the various appellants Shriyuts Lakshmi Kumaran, R.C. Gupta, Arun Mehta, S.K. Bagaria, K.K. Kapoor, T. Gunasekaran, G. Prabhakara Sastry, C. Willingdon and the Senior Departmental Representative, Sri Sanjeev Sachdeva.
2.The respondent in Appeal E.332/94 and the appellants in other appeals are manufacturers of excisable final products. They availed modvat credit in respect of certain goods claimed as inputs as defined in Rule 57A of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The jurisdictional Assistant Collectors disallowed modvat credit. In the case relating to appeal E.332/94, the Collector (Appeals) set aside the order, holding that the respondent was entitled to benefit of modvat credit while the Collectors (Appeal) in the other cases confirmed the orders disallowing the benefit of modvat credit. In a few of the cases, modvat credit was disallowed on the ground that the goods in respect of which credit was claimed were spare parts of machinery which attract the exclusion clause (i) of explanation to sub-rule (1) of Rule 57A of the orders. In some of the cases, it was held that the goods claimed to be inputs were not used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The Collector (Appeals) took the contrary view in one of the cases as indicated already.
3. The particulars of the cases are as follows:-
| Appeal No. | Period | Input | Output | Appellant | ||||
| E.21/88. | July 1987. | Spares of | Dry Cell | Union Carbide | ||||
| machines. | batteries. | India Ltd. | ||||||
| E.601/90. | Jan. 1988 to | Dryer felt, | Paper. | B.K. Paper | ||||
| June 1989. | Phosper Bronze, | Mills. | ||||||
| Metal cloth. | ||||||||
| E.737/90. | July 1989 | |||||||
| to Sept. 1989. | -do- | -do- | -do- | |||||
| E.19/91. | Oct. 1989 | |||||||
| to Dec. 1989. | -do- | -do- | -do- | |||||
| E. 1714/94. | 1.4.93 to | Cotton Felts, | -do- | Ballarpur | ||||
| 30.6.93. | Woollen Felts, Synthetic Felts. | Industries. | ||||||
| E. 1713/94. | 1.7.93 to 31.12.93. | -do- | -do- | -do- | ||||
| E.2489/94. | January | |||||||
| and Feb. 1994. | -do- | -do- | -do- | |||||
| E. 1435/94. | March to | |||||||
| July 1994. | -do- | -do- | -do- | |||||
| E. 1244/89. | With effect | Endless | Duplex M/s. | Rollat- | ||||
| from | wire cloth | Board Kraft | ainers Ltd. | |||||
| 1.3.87. | Endless | Paper. | ||||||
| wire mesh Endless felts. | ||||||||
| E.49/92. | September | Felts, | Paper and | Orient Paper | ||||
| 1989. | Bronzemetal cloth, wire cloth, Dandy cloth. | paper Board. | Mills. | |||||
| E. 106/92. | October | |||||||
| 1989 | -do- | -do- | -do- | |||||
| E. 1901/92. | May 1989 | Copper wire. | Metal | |||||
| to May 1991. | container. | |||||||
| E. 865/93. | Sept. 1992 | Woollen | Kraft paper | Remco Paper | ||||
| to Oct. | felt, wire | and Paper | and Board. | |||||
| 1992. | mesh. | Board. | ||||||
| E. 1866/92. | August 1992 | Woollen | Kraft paper | Kwality Pulp | ||||
| to Sept. | felt, wire | and Paper | and Paper | |||||
| 1992. | mesh. | Board. | Mills. | |||||
| E.332/94. | -do- | Kraft Paper. | C.C.E. Visak-hapatnam. | |||||
| E.1116/95. | Sept. 1993 | Endless | Duplex | Rollatainers. | ||||
| to December 1993. | felts, Endless wire cloth. | Board. |
4. Resolution of the controversy in these appeals depends on the correct understanding of provisions of Rule 57A relating to Modvat Credit Scheme. The scheme enables manufacturers of specified final products to avail credit of specified duty paid on specified goods (referred to as "inputs"") used in or in relation to the manufacture of the said final products and to utilise such credit towards payment of excise duty leviable on the final products under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (for short, the Act) or under any other Act as may be specified. The provision is subject to the provisions of the other Rules in the section and the conditions and restrictions that may be specified. Relevant port
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.