SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.P.GULATI, T.P.NAMBIAR
Jinabakul Forge (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Pagad,S. Arulswamy

ORDER

Per Shri V.P. Gulati :

This appeal is against the order of the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore. Under the impugned order the appellants have held to have been evaded duty in respect of the forgings which had been manufactured on job work basis. The appellants are manufacturers of forgings on their own account as also on the account of others out of the raw materials supplied by them. The appellants had got their classification list approved both in respect of the goods manufactured by them out of their own raw materials as well as in respect of the goods manufactured on job work basis. The appellants in respect of the goods manufactured on job work basis claimed benefit of Notification 214/86 and the classification list based on that was approved. The appellants however did not follow the procedure as envisaged under Notification 214/86 as their customers got the work manufactured on job work basis was not operating under the MODVAT Scheme for the benefit of Notification 214/86 had been issued.

2. The learned Consultant for the appellants has pleaded that the appellants were law abiding and to establish their bonafides they paid duty as was demanded and thereafter only co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top