SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.P.GULATI, T.P.NAMBIAR
Harts Cocoa Products (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mythili,R. Arulswamy

ORDER

Per Shri V.P. Gulati :

The issue in the appeal relates to the demand of duty in respect of goods held to have been manufactured by the appellants with the Brand name of another. The appellants had availed of the benefit of Notification 175/86 in respect of these and had held out that the brand name owner was eligible to the benefit of Notification 175/86 and had produced a Provisional certificate of registration as an SSI Unit in the name of the brand name owner. The fact in brief as set out in the Ld. lower authority's order and which are not in dispute are set out below:

"On 13.1.92 the Central Excise Officers of Madras VII Division, Preventive Unit, visited the said factory for verification of the records. During the course of verification, they found that the factory besides manufacturing confectionery with their own brand name `Harts', also manufactured and supplied to M/s. Mikie Orient Confectioneries, Madras-8, confectioneries with their brand name `Mikie'. They also manufactured supplied confectionery to M/s. National Products, Bangalore, with their brand name `NP'.

In respect of the products manufactured and supplied under their own brand name, they availed exemption und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top