SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, P.K.KAPOOR
Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Cochin – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Joseph Vellapally, Joseph Kodianthara, Mukti Sinha,Somesh Arora

ORDER

Per S.L. Peeran : In all these appeals common question of facts and law is involved and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law.

2. The question that arises for our consideration in these appeals is with regard to the grant of exemption of Notification No. 217/86-CE dt. 2.4.86. The lower original authorities have held that as the final product cleared by the appellants viz. Aluminium Extrusions have been exempted from duty under Notification No. 123/ 81 -CE dt. 2.6.81 and under various other notifications relating to clearance to units located in free trade zones, they are, therefore, liable to pay duty on the intermediate product namely Aluminium Billets, which are used in the manufacture of Extrusions in view of the conditions stipulated in the proviso to Notification No. 217/86-CE dt. 2.4.86. The ld. Collector after examining the proviso to this notification has confirmed the finding of the original authority. Noting the argument of the appellant that the extrusions cleared by them are not exempted from duty or chargeable to 'Nil' rate of duty, as the clearance of extrusion in terms of the notifications is on the basis of a bond executed by the consignee, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top