SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.P.AGARWAL, P.K.KAPOOR
H. M. Bags – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S. Sunder Rajan,Sidarath Kak

ORDER

Per. P.K. Kapoor: This is an appeal against the order passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants who are engaged in the manufacture of HDPE/PP Woven Sacks, filed a Classification List seeking the classification of HDPE/PP Woven Sacks under Subheading 6301.00 of the Central Excise Tariff. On the basis of the order No. 8/92 dated 24.11.92 issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs under the provisions of Section 37-B, the appellants were served with a Show Cause Notice seeking the recovery of differential duty amounting to Rs. 4,31,838/- in respect of the clearances of the said goods effected from the factory during the period June, 1992 to November, 1992 on the grounds that the goods in question were classifiable under sub-heading 3923.90. The appellants contested the demand on the ground that the clearances during the relevant period having been effected on the basis of an approved Classification List no demand could be raised for the past period until the Classification List was revised and any revision of the Classification List could have only prospective effect. However,, by his order da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top