SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, S.L.PEERAN, P.K.KAPOOR
ITC Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent


ORDER

Per P.C. Jain :

Since common questions are involved, a common order is being passed.

2. Question involved in these cases is whether the printed paper board articles described as follow :-

(i) Outer shells only

(ii) Outer shells along with slides

(iii) Hinge-lids cut out and inner frames,

are printed cartons which include within their scope folded and flattened containers of paper and paper board within the description of erstwhile Tariff Item 17(4) (as it stood before 1.3.86) read with notification No. 66/82-CE dt. 28.2.82.

3. Learned advocate Shri Ravinder Narain for some of the appellants herein has urged that the question of dutiability of cigarette packets/outer shells/outer-shells with inner slides under erstwhile Tariff Item 17(4) read with notification 66/82-CE dt. 28.2.82 has already been gone into by the High Courts of Delhi and Madras in the case (i) Zupiter Printery and Another Vs. UOI [1991 (34) ECR (Delhi)] and (ii) Asia Tobacco Co. Ltd. Vs. UOI [1992 (58) ELT 18 (Mad.)] respectively.

4. On the analogy of reasoning in the aforesaid two judgments of the High Courts, he submits that Hinge lids cut out and inner frames cannot also be made liable to duty in terms of the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top