VINEET KOTHARI
Mrigendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sohan Raj Surana – Respondent
Dr. Vineet Kothari, J.—None is present on behalf of appellant/plaintiff, though names of Mr. Arpit Bhoot, Mr. Surendra Singh, and Ms. Mehak Chopra have been shown in the cause list at Serial No.48, and despite message sent to them nobody put in appearance on behalf of plaintiff/appellant though Mr. Surendra Singh had appeared in a case before this Court today in the case listed at Serial No.16 only. The matter was thus heard from the side of the respondents for about one hour before lunch break. Even in the second round post lunch session, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of appellant/plaintiff to argue the case, therefore, the case was again heard after lunch break and learned counsel for the respondents/defendants and applicant addressed the Court and the present appeal is being disposed of by the following order.
2. By the impugned order dated 01.10.2012, learned trial court of Additional District Judge (FT) No.3, Jodhpur Metropolitan, has allowed the application filed by the respondents/defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and dismissed the Suit No.14/2002- Mrigendra Singh Vs. Sohan Raj Surana & Ors. The reasons and findings rec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.