U. C. Dhyani, J.—By means of present writ petition, the petitioner seeks following relief, among others:

“Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 15.02.2016 passed by IVth Additional District Judge, Dehradun and order dated 30.05.2015 passed by IIIrd Addl. Civil Judge (S.D.) Dehradun on amendment application/ impeadment application paper no.136A filed by the plaintiff/petitioner in Original Suit No.170/05, Suresh Chand vs. Nagar Nigam & others, pending in the court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Dehradun and the amendment application filed by the petitioner, paper No.136A may be allowed in toto.”

2. A suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was filed by the plaintiff-petitioner against the respondent nos.2 & 3 initially, to which, respondent no.1 was added subsequently on his impleadment application. Learned counsel for the parties pointed out that issues have been framed, but, the same were not framed when the plaintiff sought the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments sought to be incorporated by the plaintiff have been mentioned in Annexure-4 to the writ petition. Since the proposed amendments are lengthy, hence, this