PRAKASH GUPTA
Kana (since deceased) through Legal heirs and legal representatives – Appellant
Versus
Mooli – Respondent
Prakash Gupta, J.—The instant Civil Second Appeal under Section 100 read with Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the defendant-appellants against impugned judgment and decree dated 31.8.1999 passed by learned District Judge, Tonk in Civil Regular Appeal No. 5/1992, whereby learned first appellate Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the defendant-appellants against the judgment and decree dated 6.12.1991 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Tonk in Civil suit No. 187/81 (277/1984) decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs filed for cancellation of sale-deed and for possession of the disputed property.
2. The relevant facts of the case in brief are that the plaintiff Ram Narayan and Mst. Dhakha and Mst. Rampyari (respondent Nos. 6 and 7 respectively) filed a civil suit in the court of learned Additional Munsif, Tonk (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial court’) for cancellation of registered sale-deed dated 8.6.1971, allegedly executed by Ladu in favour of the defendants Kana and Moolia for a consideration of Rs.2,000/-. The plaintiffs also prayed for restoration of their possession over the land comprisi
Gajara Vishnu Gosavi vs. Prakash Nanasaheb Kamble and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.