SUDHIR AGARWAL
Nagendra Nath Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Bhanu Pratap Sinha – Respondent
Sudhir Agarwal, J.— Heard Sri Faujdar Rai, Advocate, assisted by Sri C.K. Rai, Advocate, for the appellants and Sri A.K. Goyal, Advocate, for respondents.
2. This is defendants Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “Code”).
3. Substantial questions of law, which have arisen in this case, are:
(1) Whether the Courts below are justified in granting relief to the plaintiff/respondent beyond what he has stated in the plaint? In other words, can relief be granted to a plaintiff beyond the claim set up by him in the plaint? .
(2) Whether the Courts below have granted relief to plaintiff-respondents in the present case beyond the assertions contained in the plaint and such decree whether is sustainable in law?
4. Plaintiff/respondent No.1 (impleaded as Respondent I set and hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”) instituted Original Suit No. 694 of 1993 impleading six defendants, wherein present appellants were impleaded as defendants No.1, 4 and 6. The defendant/respondent No.2 to 4 (II set) were impleaded as defendants No.2, 3, and 5. All the defendants, except defendant No.1, are real brothers, being sons of Nagendra N
Pandohi Ahir v. Faruq Khan and Anr.
Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College, Shamli & Ors., v. Lakshmi Narain and Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.