KRISHNA MURARI
Noorjahan – Appellant
Versus
Zaibun Nisa – Respondent
Krishna Murari, J.— Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 14.5.2012 passed by Judge, Small Causes. Court rejecting their application under Order 21 Rule 97 and 101 read with Section 151 CPC as well as revisional order dated 14.5.2013. .
2. The facts leading to the present dispute may be briefly stated as under.
3. Smt. Zaibun Nisa and Smt. Shamun Nisa alongwith their mother late Smt. Ashgari Begum filed a suit before Judge, Small Causes Court on 20.04.1992 against Nazim Ali (respondent No.3 herein) for ejectment and arrears of rent on the allegations that he was a tenant in the disputed property and was in arrears of rent and the tenancy was terminated. In the said suit, Smt. Noorjahan and Shahnoor, the petitioners herein moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for being impleaded in the proceedings on the allegation that Smt. Zaibun Nisa and Smt. Shamun Nisa had wrongly filed the suit alleging themselves to be the landlady and the property in dispute was purchased by one Smt. Shakina Begum from Bhurey Khan by means of r
Rajendra Kumar v. 3rd Additional District Judge, Moradabad & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.