MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Subedar Kanwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harman Singh – Respondent
Mohammad Rafiq, J.—This is plaintiff’s first appeal directed against the judgment & decree dated 24.03.1990 of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kishangarh Bas, District Alwar whereby, his suit for specific performance of the contract and perpetual injunction was dismissed. In the plaint, it was averred by the plaintiff that defendant No.1 was khatedar of land bearing Khasra No.34 measuring 3 bighas 12 biswas situated at Village Kirwari. He entered into an agreement with plaintiff on 01.07.1986 for sale of this land to him for consideration of Rs. 72,000/-. Defendant No.1 accepted Rs.16,500/- as advance money and delivered possession of the land to the plaintiff as part performance of the contract. Agreement to sale (Exh. 5) was reduced into writing on a stamp paper in the presence of witnesses and got attested by the Notary Public. Defendant No.1 also gave a receipt on the same document (Exh.5) and also signed both the documents. As per agreement to sale, defendant No.1 was required to get the registered sale-deed executed upto July, 1987. Plaintiff-appellant approached defendant No.1 many a time asking to execute the registered sale-deed but he refused to pe
Pandurang Ganpat Tanwade v. Ganpat Bhairu Kadam and Ors.
Nagindas Ramdas v. Dalpatram Ichharam alias Brijram and Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.