SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.S.RAMANATHAN
P. Kumaran, Padiyanallore, Red Hills, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
V. Ramaswami – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.S. Ramanathan, J.—The first defendant in C.S.No.121 of 2007 is the applicant and the Application is filed to reject the plaint for nondisclosure f cause of action and lack of it.

2. The respondents 1 and 2 / plaintiffs filed the suit C.S.No.121 of 2007 for the following reliefs:-

“praying for a judgment and decree against the defendants directing the defendants to execute the sale deed conveying the plaint schedule property to the plaintiffs by receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs. 5,90,50,000/-” (Rs. 1,50,000/- per cent for 4.27 acres giving credit to Rs.50,00,000/- received as advance by the defendants) and in the event of the defendants failing to execute the sale deed, the sale deed may be executed by this Hon’ble Court or by any Officer nominated or appointed by this Hon’ble Court and in the event of the decree for specific performance not being granted directing the defendants to pay a sum of Rs. 1,30,00,000/- (Rs.50,00,000/-) paid as advance Rs. 10,00,000/- received by the first defendant on 1.1.2006, Rs.25,00,000/- received by the first defendant on 29.4.2006 and Rs.45,00,000/- representing the cost of filling up the property with gravel) with 18% intere









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top