SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, M.M.SUNDRESH
Himayam Engineers and Builders, Represented by its Proprietor – Appellant
Versus
S. Ravichandran – Respondent
Satish K. Agnihotri and M.M. Sundresh, JJ.— The appellant herein was plaintiff in the suit. Defendants/Respondents 1 and 2 are the owners and the 3rd respondent/3rd defendant is the power agent. A development agreement was entered into by the plaintiff on 10.9.2003 with the third defendant, who is the power of attorney agent of defendants 1 and 2 at Chennai under Ex.P.9 to develop four plots of land in S.No.415, Mogappair village, Saidapet Taluk, Chengalpet District. Alleging that the respondents are threatening to dispossess the appellant/plaintiff, a suit was filed by him in O.S.No.30 of 2005 on the file of District Munsif’s Court, Ambattur seeking declaration that the agreement dated 10.9.2003 by the defendants is illegal and invalid land for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from preventing the plaintiff with the construction or development of the plaint schedule property. Thereafter, a comprehensive suit was filed in C.S.No.460 of 2005 before this Court claiming the following relief:
‘‘The plaintiff therefore prays for a judgment and decree against the defendants:
(a) granting specific performance of the ‘‘development agreement’ dated 10.9.2003 ente
Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar and another
J.K. Abdul Jabbar Rowther v. V.J. Malni Raj and others
K.N. Palaniswamy Gounder v. P.Subramanian
Chandradhoja Sahoo v. State of Orissa and Others
Bhairab Chandra Nandan v. Ranadhir Chandra Dutta
Coffee Board v. Ramesh Exports Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.