B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Katta Penchalaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Mopuru Veera Raghava Reddy – Respondent
B. Chandra Kumar, J.—This CRP is directed against the judgment and decree dated 22.09.2011 passed in O.S. No.171 of 2006 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
2. The defendants in the said suit are the petitioners herein and the plaintiff in the said suit is the respondent herein. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the lower Court for the sake of convenience.
3. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that one Gollamudi Radha Prathima, W/o Venkateswara Reddy obtained a decree against one Punyakoti Narasimha Rao and his wife Vijaya in O.S. No.242 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore. Thereafter the suit schedule property was attached on 20.04.2002 and it was brought for sale in execution proceedings in E.P. No.113 of 2003. The further case of the plaintiff is that, he participated in the auction held by the Court on 26.07.2005 and was declared as highest bidder for a sum of Rs.3,60,000/- and he obtained sale certificate. The further case of the plaintiff is that he filed EA No.25 of 2006 in OS No.242 of 1997 for delivery of the schedule property to him and an Amin was deputed to del
Daggubati Ranganayakulu (died) per LRs v. Polini Venkata Subbaiah (per LRs)
Kanakadhara Constructions, Hyderabad v. K. Jhansi Lakshmi Bai
Ratan Lal Jain v. Uma Shankar Vyas
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.