SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Parsadi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr.Surendra Tiwari, Advocate
For the Respondents: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.—Heard Sri Surendra Tiwari, for the petitioners.

2. The writ petitions have been filed against the orders of Board of Revenue, U.P. dated 21.10.2014 allowing impleadment application of M/S Lee Way Clothing Private Limited (respondent-11) in second appeal and revision filed by the petitioners, on the ground that during pendency of the litigation it has purchased the land in dispute through registered sale deed dated 4.12.2012 executed by Ujjwal Sagar Suri and others (respondents-5 and 8).

3. The dispute relates to plot 1743 (area 0-10-0 bigha), 1744 (area 1-5-0 bigha) and 1745 (area 1-2-0 bigha) of village Arthala, pargana Loni, district Ghaziabad. The petitioners filed a suit (registered as Suit No. 68 of 1988) for declaring them as ‘bhumidhar with transferable right’ of the land in dispute. It has been stated by the petitioners that they were in possession of the land in dispute for last 30 years from the time of their grandfather Cheetar and have acquired ‘bhumidhar with transferable right’ over it. The defendants were not in possession of it. The suit was contested by Ujjawal Sagar Suri and others (respondents-5 and 8). They filed their joint writ























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top