C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
T. M. Nagarani – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Tiles – Respondent
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.— This civil revision petition arises out of order dated 22.12.2011 in R.A.No.116 of 2011 on the file of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, whereby he has reversed the order, dated 13.4.2010, in RC No. 26 of 2010 on the file of the learned Principal Rent Controller, Secunderbad.
2. The petitioners filed R.C.No.26 of 2010 seeking eviction of the respondent under Sections 10(2)(i) and 10(3)(iii)( a) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short ‘the Act’). The respondent raised an objection on the maintainability of eviction petition on the ground that even according to the petitioners, the rent of the building in question is Rs.3,500 per month and that as per the amended provisions of Section 32(c) of the Act, if the rent of the building exceeds Rs.2,000 in the areas other than the Municipal Corporation areas, the Rent Controller will cease to have jurisdiction to entertain the application for eviction. The respondent further pleaded that the demised premises is admittedly situated in the Secunderabad Cantonment area and that therefore, it does not form part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation ar
Cantonment Board, Secunderabad v. G. Venketram Reddy and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.