SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Kera Ram – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. J.R. Patel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.—This miscellaneous appeal has been brought by defendants No.3 and 4 challenging the validity of order dated 10.07.2009 passed by Addl. District Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Jodhpur in Civil Misc. Case No.72/200/ whereby, trial Court allowed application filed by respondent-plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2,C.P.C.

2. Respondent-plaintiff Mohanlal filed suit in the trial Court for cancellation of sale-deed and permanent injunction in respect of land in dispute. Respondent-plaintiff Mohanlal pleaded in the suit that he has 13 bigha 3 biswa land in village Tanavada (Mogada) Khasra No.42/2, out of which, he executed power of attorney in favour of defendant No.2 as per saying of defendant No.1. For the said purpose, stamp was brought by defendant No.3. Later on, however, the plaintiff found that defendants No.1 to 3 have conspired together and instead of 3 bigha land, power of attorney has been forged in favour of defendant No. 2 in respect of 5 bigha land and, on that basis, defendant No.2 on behalf of the plaintiff-respondent sold 1 bigha 10 biswa land, in favour of defendant No.1 and defendant No.4 has illegally started raising construction on the sai

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top