State of Jharkhand VS Naryan Das

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

PRAMATH PATNAIK
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Naryan Das – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner (in Civil Review No. 8 of 2016 with Civil Review No. 12 of 2016): Mrs. Aprajita Bhardwaj, A.C. to A.G.
For the Respondents (in Civil Review No. 8 of 2016):- M/s. Rupesh Singh and Amrendra Pradhan, Advocates.
For the Respondents (in Civil Review No. 12 of 2016):- M/s. Sameer Saurabh and Vishal Kumar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Per Pramath Patnaik, J.—Since the aforementioned Civil Review applications [Civil Review No. 8 of 2016 with Civil Review No. 12 of 2016] involve common questions of law, therefore, the said applications have been heard analogously and with the consent of the respective counsels, are being disposed of by this common order.

Civil Review No. 8 of 2016

2. The present Civil Review application has been preferred for modification/review of the order dated 11.06.2013, passed in W.P. (S) No.2917 of 2010, whereby this Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim on the basis of re-measurement report of the Medical Board and to allot additional point according to the said measurement and pass appropriate order, regarding his appointment, within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order, passed therein.

3. It has been averred in the Review application that the petitioner has filed the writ application bearing W.P. (S) No. 2917 of 2010 and the said writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 11.06.2013 and the Notification of Home Dept., Govt. of Jharkhand was published on 12.11.2001 after bifurcati