Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J.—The validity of a sale deed not cancelled by a Civil Court according to Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act is the core issue involved in this appeal.

2. 7th defendant is the appellant. O.S.No.2990/2010 was brought by respondents no. 1 & 2 in the court of XL Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, claiming the following reliefs:

“a. For a judgment and decree to declare that the entries as found in the encumbrance certificate and so also the records pertaining to a registering authority relating to the suit property as found in items one to seven and so also the entry as found in the encumbrance certificate for the period 01.04.2004 to 26.11.2008 as per entry number one reflecting the same transaction between Sri. Srivatsan Rangachari and C. Ramesh who are the defendants six and seven are fraudulent entries and hence not binding on the plaintiffs.

b. For a judgment and decree for mandatory injunction by way of a direction to the defendants one to three to delete/revoke the entries as found in the encumbrance certificate and all the records pertaining to the registering authority as relating to the transaction reflected in items one to seven fo