DELHI HIGH COURT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Harkesh Kumar Dang —Petitioner
versus
Union of India and Ors. —Respondents
W.P.(C) 4960 of 2021 and CM
APPL. 15212 of 2021
Decided on 6.5.2021
Constitution of India – Article 226 – Petition for restraining concerned Regional Passport Officer from issuing/reissuing Passport of minor son of Petitioner – Due to matrimonial disputes between parties, child is suffering in bargain – Child’s education is being irreparably prejudiced as he is unable to travel back to Germany due to him not having a passport as on date – Earlier passport has admittedly been destroyed/mutilated and he requires a fresh passport to be able to travel to Germany – Owing to stand of passport authority, Passport of child is currently not being issued by passport office – Reliefs prayed for in present writ stand satisfied – However, in order to ensure that said situation does not prolong indefinitely, either of parties is permitted to approach trial court for permission to apply for a fresh passport for child – Such a request, if made, shall be considered by trial court, after hearing both parents of child. (Paras 9 to 11)
(B) Passports Act, 1967 – Sections 3, 5 and 6 – Issuance of fresh Passport for child of estranged parents – Passport was sought to be procured on the basis of false information being furnished by Respondent-mother – Court is not dealing with matrimonial disputes between parties, which are pending before various Courts – Present case is only concerned with respect to issuance of Passport to child – Earlier passport has admittedly been destroyed/mutilated and he requires a fresh passport to be able to travel to Germany – Owing to stand of Passport Authority, Passport of child is currently not being issued by passport office – Either of parties permitted to approach trial court for permission to apply for a fresh passport for child – Such a request, if made, shall be considered by trial court, after hearing both parents of child – Trial court would then consider question as to whether a fresh application for issuance of a Passport can be permitted and if so, what would be conditions under which same would be allowed. (Paras 7, 9, 10 and 11)
Result: Writ Petition disposed of with observations.
ORDER
Prathiba M. Singh, J.—This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. The present petition has been filed by Mr. Harkesh Kumar Dang, the father of the child namely Vivaan Dang, husband of Respondent No.3 - Tamanna Dang, with a prayer that the child, who is a minor, should not be issued a fresh passport by Respondent No.2 - Regional passport office, without the consent of the Petitioner.
3. The case of the Petitioner is that the son- Vivaan Dang, is in the custody of his wife i.e. Respondent No.3, Ms. Tamanna Dang and child custody proceedings are going on in the court of the Presiding Officer, Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, Noida. According to the Petitioner, Respondent No. 3 has applied for a fresh passport for the child based on wrong facts and incorrect documents and data. Accordingly, this petition prays for restraining the issuance of a fresh passport by the passport authorities as the apprehension of the Petitioner is that if a fresh passport is issued, Respondent No.3 may take the child out of the jurisdiction of this Court i.e. to Germany, in spite of there only being a “stop-gap” arrangement of custody in favour of the Respondent No. 3.
4. The reliefs sought for in this petition are as under:
“(a) Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or a direction, restraining the concerned Regional Passport Officer, Delhi, form issuing/reissuing the passport of ‘VD’ the minor son of the Petitioner, applied on 01.02.2021 by Respondent No. 3 Tamanna Dang, vide File Number DL1075176530621, without written approval and consent of the Petitioner.
(b) Revoke/Suspend the said passport, if already approved and issued in the interim.
(c) Restrain Respondent No. 3 from taking the minor child out of India, till adjudication of child custody proceedings, or till such appropriate further orders.
(d) Pass any such other or further order/s or direction/s, as this Hon’ble Court shall deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, and in the interest of Justice.”
5. On the last date, i.e., 23rd April 2021, this court had directed the passport office to file a status report in respect of the status of the issuance of the fresh passport for Vihaan Dang, and restrained its issuance without the permission of this court.
6. The case of Respondent No.3 is that there was an order by a Court in Germany, giving shared custody of the child to both the parents who were located in Germany. In violation of the said order, the child was brought to India, and thereafter the custody of the child has been handed over to the mother.
7. Today, the passport office has filed an affidavit on record informing the Court that the Respondent No.3 had applied for the child’s fresh passport in the ‘Lost’ Category and had filed a declaration in respect of the lost/ damaged category. Thereafter, the father had complained to the passport office that the said passport was sought to be procured on the basis of false information being furnished by Respondent No. 3. The passport office had also got a police verification done and the said police verification report was “Adverse” towards the Respondent No. 3. The remark on the police verification report was that “the Applicants mother has given address of her maternal uncle where, as per local enquiry she is not residing. Moreover, a case FIR No. 67/2l dated 03.02.2021 u/s 294 IPC and 11/12 POCSO Act 2012 has been registered against the applicant’s mother on the complaint of father of the applicant.” Accordingly, as on date, the status report states that the passport of the child - Vivan Dang, is not being processed by the passport office, and the same is stated to have been put in the ‘Stop’ category.
8. Ld. Counsels appearing for the parties have informed the Court that there are at least 8-10 proceedings qua matrimonial issues, which are pending between the parties.
9. It is made clear that this Court is not dealing with the matrimonial disputes between the parties
SupremeToday
Welfare of minor child is paramount in event of matrimonial discord between parents.
In divorce cases concerning minors, both parents' consent or court permission is required for passport issuance, emphasizing the need for mutual agreement or legal oversight.
Passport for minor child post-divorce can be issued to custodial parent with Annexure-C affidavit without other parent's consent.
Mother with custody may obtain minor's passport without father's consent, subject to no-travel-without-consent condition.
The right to obtain a passport for a minor is integral to personal liberty under Article 21 and cannot be denied due to parental disputes.
The court emphasized the importance of cooperation between parents in cases involving child custody and passport issuance, and highlighted the significance of obtaining consent from both parents or a....
A single parent can apply for a minor child's passport without the father's consent amid marital discord.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.