SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Sai Constructions – Appellant
Versus
Modern India Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Smt. Deepa Udiyar, Advocate for Sri A.P. Murari, Advocate

ORDER

Sachin Shankar Magadum, J.—The captioned writ petition is filed by the plaintiff challenging the order passed by the Court below on I.A.No.78 filed under Section 151 of CPC, wherein the request made by the plaintiff to club the present suit pending in O.S.No.156/2014 to be clubbed with O.S.No.362/2019.

2. The petitioner/plaintiff has filed present suit in O.S.No.156/2014 seeking relief of specific performance against respondent/defendant on the basis of agreement of sale dated 01.05.2012. The present petitioner has also filed a similar suit bearing O.S.No.130/2014 on the basis of agreement of sale dated 05.11.2010 in respect of some other properties, which was later renumbered as O.S.No.362/2019.

3. The petitioner/plaintiff has filed an application in I.A.No.78 to club both the suits on the premises that the parties in both the suits are one and the same. Learned Judge has rejected the application by holding that both these suits are filed on different suit agreements in respect of different properties and there by the cause of action in both the suits are different and distinct. Hence the question of clubbing both the suits would not arise in the present case on hand. On the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top