SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 711

K. LAKSHMAN
Anireddy Amrutha Devi – Appellant
Versus
Cherupally Prakash – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.Venkat Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Sri P.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondent.

2. The petitioners/defendants have filed the present revision seeking to set aside the order dtd. 11/11/2022 in I.A.No.390 of 2022 in O.S.No.8 of 2016 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda.

3. Perusal of the record would reveal that the respondent/plaintiff filed O.S.No.8 of 2016 before the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda against the petitioners/defendants seeking perpetual injunction restraining the petitioners herein from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from the suit schedule property as long as he pays the lease amount to the defendants in respect of the suit schedule property i.e. H.No.19-2 part, 4th shop admeasuring 10sq.yards, Pooja Medical Hall situated at Shakuntala and Raghava Talkies complex, Church Road, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District.

4. 3rd petitioner/3rd defendant filed O.S.No.310 of 2021 against the respondent/plaintiff seeking perpetual injunction restraining the respondent/plaintiff from evicting her from shop bearing part in D.No.19-2 part (Shop No.4) in Sy.No.727 to 73

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top