K. LAKSHMAN
Amireddy Amrutha Devi @ Amruthamma – Appellant
Versus
Cherupally Prakash – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Sri P.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners. Despite ervice of notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondent.
2. The petitioners/defendants have filed the present revision seeking to set aside the order dated 11.11.2022 in I.A.No.390 of 2022 in O.S.No.8 of 2016 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda.
3. Perusal of the record would reveal that the respondent/plaintiff filed O.S.No.8 of 2016 before the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda against the petitioners/defendants seeking perpetual injunction restraining the petitioners herein from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from the suit schedule property as long as he pays the lease amount to the defendants in respect of the suit schedule property i.e. H.No.19-2 part, 4th shop admeasuring 10sq.yards, Pooja Medical Hall situated at Shakuntala and Raghava Talkies complex, Church Road, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District.
4. 3rd petitioner/3rd defendant filed O.S.No.310 of 2021 against the respondent/plaintiff seeking perpetual injunction restraining the respondent/plaintiff from evicting her from shop bearing part in D.No.19-2 part (Shop No.4) in Sy.No.727 to 730 admea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.