Urvashi Aggarwal VS Inderpaul Aggarwal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Urvashi Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Inderpaul Aggarwal – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Praveen Suri and Ms. Komal Chhibber, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Digvijay Ray and Mr. Aman Yadav, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Crl.M.A.11083/2021

Subramonium Prasad, J.—This Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for seeking the review of the Order of this Hon’ble Court dated 14.06.2021 in Criminal Revision Petition 549/2021 wherein this Court had granted a sum of Rs. 15,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the revisionist/Petitioner No.1 till the Petitioner No. 2 completes his graduation or starts earning, whichever is earlier.

2. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Counsel for the Respondent, has put forth four grounds for recalling the Order dated 14.06.2021 rendered by this Hon’ble Court:

i. The learned Counsel for the Respondent has submitted that the impugned Judgement fails to deal with Amarendra Kumar Paul v. Maya Paul & Ors., (2009) 8 SCC 359, wherein the Supreme Court had held that according to Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., an application for grant of maintenance is maintainable so far as the concerned children have not attained majority. It is stated that Petitioner No. 2 had attained majority on 14.08.2018, and completion of graduation would entail maintenance being given till 14.08.2021.

ii. It has been submitted by Mr. Rai that this Hon’ble Court has proceeded on the ground that the