JUDGMENT

T. Raja, J.—Mrs. P. Hemamalini, the unsuccessful plaintiff has brought this first appeal, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2018 passed in O.S.No.181 of 2011 by the learned Additional District Judge, Additional District (Fast Track) Court, Mettur.

2. Shri N. Jothi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/plaintiff pleaded that the appellant/plaintiff and the second respondent/second defendant are the daughter and son of the first respondent/first defendant. The appellant and the respondents 1 & 2 belong to Hindu Undivided Family, wherein the first respondent is the Kartha and the appellant and the second respondent are the coparceners and they have been in joint possession and enjoyment of the suit properties till date without any metes and bounds. While so, the appellant/plaintiff got married on 6.6.2008. Even after the marriage, the appellant was residing in her parents house till September, 2011. Thereafter, she went and settled down at her matrimonial house demanding her legitimate share in the suit properties. But the respondents 1 & 2 have denied to partition the suit properties. Later on the appellant came to know that the respondents 1 & 2,