PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Prabhu Dayal Agarwal Kohinawal – Appellant
Versus
Hiranya Khound – Respondent
ORDER
Parthivjyoti Saikia, J.—Heard Mr. S. Chamaria, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This application filed u/s 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the legality and validity of the order dated 07.02.2017, passed by the Munsiff No. 1 in Execution Case No. 01/2016 relating to T.S. No. 24/2003.
3. The petitioner filed a Title Suit against the respondent praying for recovery of vacant possession of the suit house after ejecting the respondent there from. The suit was decreed ex-parte vide judgment and order dated 23.12.2003. The decree was prepared and signed by the judge on 11.04.2004.
4. Thereafter, on 02.01.2016, the petitioner filed an application for execution of decree. The Court below on 07.02.2017, rejected the execution application filed under Order 21 Rule 11 of the Cr.P.C. The reasons for rejection of the application was that the said petition was barred by the limitation imposed by Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
5. Here the only point of determinati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.