SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.ANAND VENKATESH
S. Sampoornam – Appellant
Versus
C. K. Shanmugam – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. A. Gouthaman, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. R. Rajarajan, Advocate for R1 to R5

JUDGMENT

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.—The Plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal.

2. The plaintiff filed the suit seeking for the relief of partition and for allotment of 1/5 th share in the suit property and also sought for declaration of the sale deed dated 15.06.2009 executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the 5th defendant as null and void.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property formed part of a larger extent of property which are ancestral in nature. It is stated that these properties were held by the great grand father Thalaivirichan Reddy, who had three sons namely Chinnasamy Reddy, Kathavarayan Reddy and Chinnappa Reddy. On the demise of Thalaivirichan Reddy, his three sons inherited the property. One of the son Kathavaraya Reddy had three sons Munirathinam, Shanmugam and Mani. According to the plaintiff, these three sons were jointly enjoying the property on the demise of Kathavaraya Reddy. The Plaintiff claims that the 1st defendant father and defendants 2 to 4 who are the sisters of the plaintiff are each entitled for 1/5th share in the suit property.

4. The grievance of the plaintiff is that the 1st defendant went ahead and sold an extent of 36 ce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top