SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Satya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Asha Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Sh. S.D. Gill, Advocate
For the Respondents:Sh. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate

JUDGMENTS

Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.—By way of the present appeal, appellants have challenged the judgment and decree passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Hamirpur, in Civil Appeal No.19 of 2007, dated 01.08.2008, vide which, the learned First Appellate Court, has affirmed the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.II, Hamirpur, in Civil Suit No.128 of 2002, dated 16.12.2006.

2. Material facts necessary for adjudication of this Regular Second Appeal are that respondents-plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as ‘plaintiffs’) maintained a suit for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the appellants-defendant (hereinafter referred to as ‘defendant’) alleging therein that the defendant alongwith other co-owners are owner-in-possession of the suit land, comprised in Khata No.106, Khatauni Nos.117 and 118, Khasra No.465/84 and 466/84, Kita-2, measuring 6 kanals 15 marlas, (hereinafter referred to as ‘suit land’) situated at Tika Sadhrian, Mouza Bamson, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur, H.P. It is alleged that there is a passage two and half feet wide passing through Khasra No.465/84 and 466/84, which starts from State

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top