SUDESH BANSAL, SUDESH BANSAL
Radha Kishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT
By The Court
Appellants-plaintiffs have preferred this civil regular first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assailing judgment and decree dated 3.12.1990 passed in civil suit No.358/1987 by the Court of Additional District Judge No.2, Jaipur City whereby and whereunder civil suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction filed by appellants-plaintiffs has been decided in the manner that instead of decreeing plaintiffs’ suit for specific performance and issuing directions to respondents-defendants to execute and register the sale deed, pursuant to their decision dated 15/16th April, 1980, in respect of suit shop which is already in possession of plaintiffs, a decree against defendants to refund the full sale amount of Rs.46,441/- has been passed by the trial Court by its own and plaintiffs have been held entitled for interest thereupon at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit i.e. 18.10.1985 until payment.
2. The relevant facts of the case as culled out from the record are that plaintiffs instituted civil suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injuncstion on 18.10.1985 stating inter alia that plaint
Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Raja Vasireddy Komalavalli Kamba and Ors.
Bishandayal and Sons vs. State of Orissa
K.P. Chowdhry vs. State of M.P.
Union of India vs. Indo-Afghan Agencies Ltd.
Century Spinning and Manufacturing Company Ltd. vs. Ulhasnagar Municipal Council
Mahabir Auto Stores vs. Indian Oil Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.