SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJESH SEKHRI, RAJESH SEKHRI
Parshotam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amarjeet Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anil Bhan, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Aayush Pangotra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

This Civil 1st Miscellaneous Appeal in terms of Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC, for short) has been preferred, by virtue of which, challenge has been thrown to order dated 31.05.2022 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Jammu (hereinafter to be referred as trial court) in file No. 13/Civil Suit/2021 titled Sh. Parshotam Singh v. Amarjeet Singh and another, vide which application filed by the appellant for interim relief has been dismissed.

2. Before a closer look at the grounds urged in the memo of appeal, it shall be apt to give an overview of the facts giving rise to the present case.

3. The appellant laid a Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell dated 23.12.2020 in the trial Court stating inter alia that agreement to sell was executed and duly notarized between him and the respondents whereby respondents agreed to sell the suit land measuring 08 kanals and 12 marlas comprising Khasra No. 329 situate at Village Phinder, Tehsil R. S. Pura in his favour for a sale consideration of Rs.16,50,000/- (rupees sixteen lacs and fifty thousand) per kanal. The appellant, at the time of execution of agreement to sell, paid an earnest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top