SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H. P. SANDESH
Sanjeevappa Dead By Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Nagamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Sri G.S. Venkatasubba Rao, Advocate
For the Respondents:Sri A.V. Gangadharappa, Advocate for C/R-1

JUDGMENT

This matter is listed for admission. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the caveator-respondent No.1.

2. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court is that, defendant No.1 is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property and he had acquired the suit schedule property under a registered sale deed dated 12.01.1995 and defendant No.1 has offered to sell the suit schedule property and the plaintiff agreed to purchase the same for a sale consideration of Rs.63,000/- and accordingly, the defendant No.1 received the advance amount of Rs.5,000/- and executed sale agreement in favour of the plaintiff. In the agreement of sale, it was mentioned that the plaintiff shall get the registered sale deed within three months by paying balance sale consideration amount of Rs.58,000/-. The plaintiff, after securing the balance consideration, approached the defendant No.1 to execute the sale deed, but, the defendant No.1 demanded more consideration and refused to execute the sale deed. Hence, the plaintiff got issued the legal notice dated 24.12.1999 asking the defendant No.1 to be present in the Sub-registrar office on 10

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top