DELHI HIGH COURT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Ritu Chernalia – Petitioner
versus
Amar Chernalia and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) No.6986 of 2023 and CM Appls. No.27185-86 of 2023
Decided on 22.5.2023
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 –Shared household – Right of daughter-in-law - Concept of ‘shared household’ clearly provides that right of daughter-in-law in shared household is not indefeasible right and cannot be to exclusion of in-laws – Daughter-in-law, while claiming rights to live in her matrimonial home or shared household, cannot be seen to argue that in-laws ought not to live with her in shared household – If circumstances exist which demonstrate that they cannot live together, alternate accommodation may also have to be explored for daughter-in-law –Petitioner is not willing to considering shifting to any alternate premises, though same is offered by Respondents 1 and 2 – Considering impugned order passed by DC, Petitioner and her son shall occupy one room in suit property – Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 together shall also occupy one bedroom – Grandson, i.e., Petitioner no.2 shall be permitted to use third bedroom for his studies, tuitions, etc – Said room shall be accessible to all parties – Common areas such as kitchen, drawing and dining room and staircase, etc., shall be used by all occupants - Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are permitted to put up CCTV cameras and recordings of same shall be accessible to Petitioner. [Paras 11, 12]
Result: Petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Prathiba M. Singh, J.—This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 27186/2023 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 6986/2023 & CM APPL. 27185/2023 (for stay)
3. This is a matrimonial dispute between Ms. Ritu Chernalia and her in-laws and husband.
4. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Ritu Chernalia challenging the impugned order dated 31st March, 2023 passed by the ld. Divisional Commissioner, GNCTD (hereinafter, ‘DC’).
5. Respondent No.1 and 2 are the Petitioner’s in-laws who are both senior citizens. Respondent No.3 is the husband of the Petitioner. Respondent No.1 and 2 preferred an eviction petition before the District Magistrate (South East), GNCTD (hereinafter, ‘DM’) under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The said petition was decided by the DM vide order dated 22nd September 2022 by which the DM directed eviction of the Petitioner from the property bearing no. C-30, South Extension I, New Delhi - 110049 (hereinafter, ‘Suit Property’). The suit property is a 3 BHK floor in South Extension, New Delhi. The relevant extract of the said order is set out below:—
“10. In view of the above observations, I, Isha Khosla, District Magistrate, District South East, through the powers conferred upon me vide ‘The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007’ and ‘The Delhi Maintenance of Parents And Senior Citizens Rules (Amended) Rules, 2016’, on considering the facts and appreciating the evidence brought on records, pass the following orders:
(1) That the Respondent Smt. Ritu Chernalia shall vacate the entire premises of the subject property bearing House No. C- 30, South Extension- 1, New Delhi- 110049 and handover the vacant peaceful possession of the subject property to the Complainants Sh. Amar Chernalia and Smt. Sunita Chernalia within 30 days of the receipt of this Order.
(ii) That the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South-East District is directed to ensure enforcement/compliance of the directions mentioned above, as per provisions under the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2016, 3(3)(ii) and also ensure that the life and property of the Complainants is secured and no harassment is caused to them by the Respondent.
(i) Beat Staff be further deputed for regular visits to the Senior Citizens Sh. Amar Chernalia and Smt. Sunita Chernalia in order to safeguard the life and property of the said Senior Citizens. Compliance report of eviction of the Respondent. Smt. Ritu Chernalia be sent to this Court within 35 days as per the provisions under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, referred above.
11. Given under the hand and seal of this Court par 9th day of September 2022.
12. Ordered accordingly.
13. File be consigned to record room.”
6. The said order was appealed by the Petitioner which was allowed by the DC. Vide the impugned order dated 31st March 2023 the eviction was set aside, however, the DC permitted the Respondent No. 1 and 2 to live in the suit property along with the Petitioner. The operative portion of the said impugned order reads as under:—
“7. This appellate authority has carefully perused the records and considered the detailed argument made both the sides during the hearing. It appears that the respondents and their son have grudge against the appellant as they were, at the time of marriage between their son and the appellant, not informed of the fact that the appellant suffers from epilepsy. It also appears that appellant has temperamental streak in her personality. She has herself admitted that she took high dose of pills and became unconscious but she has explained that this was precipitated due to uncaring and tortuous behaviour of the respondents and her son towards her. There seems to be substance in this. The person suffering epilepsy and facing mental t
Shared Household – Concept of ‘shared household’ clearly provides that right of daughter-in-law in shared household is not indefeasible right and cannot be to exclusion of in-laws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to balance the rights of both parties in a shared household, especially when senior citizens are involved, and that the daughter-in-law's ....
No doubt the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be exercised as if the court is an Appellate Court. However, when the learned Trial Court overlooks significant facts and con....
The court emphasized the harmonious interpretation of the Domestic Violence Act and Senior Citizens Act, affirming that parental rights must be weighed against the residential rights of a daughter-in....
(1) Right of residence under PWDV Act is not absolute or permanent; it is a right of protection, not possession – Equally, right of senior citizens to live peacefully with dignity in their own proper....
Eviction orders under the DV Act require careful consideration of evidence regarding shared household rights and cannot be issued without assessing domestic violence context and current legal obligat....
The court emphasized the protection of senior citizens' interests, the obligation to provide shelter for the daughter-in-law, and the need to balance the rights of the parties under the relevant stat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.