SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. K. PATTANAIK
Sasupalli Narayanamma – Appellant
Versus
Labeti Venkamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. S.S. Rao, Senior Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Rabindranath Prusty, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Instant appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is at the behest of the appellant challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 27th August, 2002 promulgated in Title Appeal No. 8 of 1999, whereby, the suit corresponding to T.S. No. No. 30 of 1998 was dismissed in whole on the grounds inter alia that the same is contrary to weight of evidence and hence, liable to be set aside with a direction to partition the suit schedule properties between her and respondent No.2.

2. The appellant instituted the suit in T.S. No.30 of 1998 seeking relief of declaration to the effect that respondent No.2 (defendant No.2) is not the adopted son of her mother, namely, K.Appamma and for partition of the schedule properties. It was pleaded by the appellant that defendant No. 2 was not the adopted son of late K.Appamma and in so far as the Will executed in favour of the former is concerned, the same is null and void. The said claim of the appellant was challenged by respondent No.2 with the pleading that he was adopted into the family and the Will was executed by late K.Appamma. Considering the pleadings of the parties, the learned Trial Court framed as many as nine i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top