SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Penumetsa Suryakantam (died) – Appellant
Versus
Penmetsa Subbaraju – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Kamla Seelam B., Advocate
For the Respondents:Turaga Sai Surya, Advocate

JUDGMENT

This Second Appeal is filed aggrieved against the Judgment and decree in A.S.No.17 of 2000 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Narsapur, dated 20.02.2004, confirming the Judgment and decree in O.S.No.217 of 1992 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Palakol, dated 21.03.2000.

2. The appellants herein are the defendants and the respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the Original Suit No.217 of 1992 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Palakol.

3. The plaintiffs initiated action in O.S.No.217 of 1992 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Palakol, with a prayer for possession of plaint ‘A’ schedule property and sites appurtenant thereto after evicting the 2nd defendant and her men and also for payment of present and future profits for the house portion.

4. The learned Junior Civil Judge, Palakol, decreed the suit by granting possession of plaint ‘A’ schedule property and sites appurtenant thereto and the 2nd defendant and her men are directed to vacate the same within three months from the date of decree, failing which, plaintiffs are at liberty to get the possession of the same through process of law. Felt aggrieved of the same, the unsuccessful 2nd defendant in the above said suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top