V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Penumetsa Suryakantam (died) – Appellant
Versus
Penmetsa Subbaraju – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal is filed aggrieved against the Judgment and decree in A.S.No.17 of 2000 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Narsapur, dated 20.02.2004, confirming the Judgment and decree in O.S.No.217 of 1992 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Palakol, dated 21.03.2000.
2. The appellants herein are the defendants and the respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the Original Suit No.217 of 1992 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Palakol.
3. The plaintiffs initiated action in O.S.No.217 of 1992 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Palakol, with a prayer for possession of plaint ‘A’ schedule property and sites appurtenant thereto after evicting the 2nd defendant and her men and also for payment of present and future profits for the house portion.
4. The learned Junior Civil Judge, Palakol, decreed the suit by granting possession of plaint ‘A’ schedule property and sites appurtenant thereto and the 2nd defendant and her men are directed to vacate the same within three months from the date of decree, failing which, plaintiffs are at liberty to get the possession of the same through process of law. Felt aggrieved of the same, the unsuccessful 2nd defendant in the above said suit
Thota Ganga Laxmi and Ors. vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh vs. Jai Prakash University and Ors.
Yellamilli Satyanarayana Murthy vs. Bokka Ramachandra Rao
Kochukakkada Aboobacker (dead) by L.Rs and Ors. Vs. Attah Kasim and Ors.
Cancellation of Settlement-Deed – Settlor once executed settlement deed bequeathing his rights to any person, later he cannot have any right to cancel settlement deed on any ground unilaterally in a ....
A settlement deed requires acceptance by the donee to be valid, and unilateral revocation is not permissible if the deed has been acted upon. Additionally, rights conferred by a compromise deed can l....
A Settlement Deed executed with irrevocable terms cannot be unilaterally cancelled, and its interpretation must consider the entire document and the parties' intentions.
A gift deed executed by a party without valid title is void; ownership must be established through a registered document as per the Transfer of Property Act.
A registered gift deed cannot be unilaterally revoked; cancellation requires judicial intervention to be valid.
Unilateral cancellation of a registered gift deed is invalid without specific grounds for revocation under law, reaffirming 'possession follows title'.
The revocation of a settlement deed must be justified under the legal provisions, and the court will consider evidence and legal principles to determine the validity of such revocation.
The legal effect of a cancellation deed executed to cancel a settlement deed and the interpretation of Ext.B1 as a gift deed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.