SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
K. Loganathan – Appellant
Versus
A. Elango – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.P. Vijayaragavan, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. A. Balasingh Ramanujam, Advocate

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.02.2023 passed by the Learned XXIII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.3 of 2022 in O.S.No.4795 of 2022.

2. The petitioner/plaintiff had originally filed a suit for recovery of money with subsequent interest. The respondent had contested the suit by way of filing a written statement and thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A.No.3 of 2022 to receive and take on record (i) Compact Disc and (ii) Call History / Transcription of the Teleconversation, as plaintiff’s side documents. The said I.A. was dismissed by the Trial Court, against which, the present CRP has been filed.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent is a cousin to the petitioner. Based on the close relationship, the respondent borrowed a sum of Rs.12,75,000/- (Twelve Lakhs and Seventy Five Thousand) for his personal and business needs from the petitioner on various dates over a period of time between 2017 to 2019 with an agreed 2% interest rate over the sum borrowed. After receipt of the money, the respondent neither paid any amount towards principal nor paid any amount towards interest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top