JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Suraj Verma, learned Spl. P.P. for the State and Mr. P.K. Deomani, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2.

2. This petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.

3. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 15.02.2021, passed in Sessions Trial No. 245 of 2018, arising out of G.R. No. 735 of 2018 [Telco P.S. Case No. 41 of 2018] by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, whereby the petition dated 15.02.2020, filed on behalf of the prosecution, has been allowed and prosecution is permitted to examine Atul Sahu as a witness for compliance of provision under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, now pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, East Singhbhum at Jamshedppur.

4. The prosecution case in brief is that daughter of the informant