SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Vikas Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Rajni Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.—Marriage, personified as the essence of togetherness, blooms on the fertile soil of mutual support, devotion and allegiance. However, repeated acts of separation, akin to a relentless storm, only uproot this foundation, scattering seeds of discord that threaten the sanctity of the union. Amidst the tempest of distance and abandonment, this bond breaks beyond repair, leaving behind irreparable scars on the landscape of trust and commitment.
The Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, has been filed by the appellant, against the Judgment dated 11.04.2022 passed by the learned Principal Family Judge, Family Court, Delhi vide which the Petition for divorce bearing H.M.A. No. 166/2017, filed by the petitioner under Section 13 (1) (i-a) and 13 (1) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, has been dismissed.
2. Briefly stated, the appellant/petitioner, who was a qualified MBBS Doctor, got married to the respondent, who was also an MBBS Doctor, on 22.02.1992, according to the Hindu Customs and Rites. They were blessed with one daughter on 09.05.1994 and one son on 11.12.2002. The life story of the appellant/petitioner and the respondent, span
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.