SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P. SAM KOSHY
Dandamudi Phani Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Boyapati Lakshmi Aparna – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. K. Sunil Chowdary, Advocate

ORDER

P. Sam Koshy, J.—The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 09.12.2023 passed by the Court of the Judge, Principal Family Court-cum-XIII Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad (for short, ‘the Court below’) in I.A.No.871 of 2023 in OPSR.No.10248 of 2022.

2. Heard Mr. K.Sunil Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioners have filed a petition under section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘H.M. Act’) seeking divorce on mutual consent along with a petition under Section 14(1) of H.M. Act with a prayer to waive the one year period for filing the divorce petition.

4. As could be seen from the order of the Court below while deciding the above interlocutory application in I.A.No.871 of 2023 and as per the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner herein, the marriage of these petitioners was performed on 01.06.2023. The petitioners continued their marital life for few months and thereafter the difference arose between them due to health problems and impotency. Despite exchanging views, both the petitioners are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top