GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Vijay Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Yadav – Respondent
ORDER
This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:—
“(i) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari order dated 15/6/2021 (Annexure P/5) and 17/1/2024 (Annexure P/6) may kindly be quashed.
(ii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus Tehsildar may kindly be restrained to change the revenue entry on the basis of order passed by the Addl.Commissioner dated 17/1/2024..
(iii) Any other writ or direction as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.”
2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioners that as per the M.P. Bhu-Rajaswa Sanhita (Bhu-Abhilekhon main Namantaran) Niyam, 2018 (In short ‘Niyam, 2018’), the name can be mutated in the revenue records on the basis of Will, therefore, revenue authorities are well within their rights to direct the mutation of names on the basis of Will.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for petitioners.
4. There is no doubt that a title can be acquired by virtue of Will and once the title can be acquired, then the name can also be mutated in the revenue records irrespective of fact as to whether there is any rule in that regard or not? Even otherwise as per
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs. B.N. Thimmajamma and Ors.
Surendra Pal and Ors. vs. Dr. (Mrs.) Saraswati Arora and Anr.
Dhanpat vs. Sheo Ram (Deceased) through legal representatives and Ors.
Bharpur Singh and Ors. vs. Shamsher Singh
Savithri and Ors. vs. Karthyayani Amma and Ors.
Balathandayutham and Anr. vs. Ezhilarasan
Meenakshiammal (Dead) through legal representatives and Ors. vs. Chandrasekaran and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.