SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
R.I. Chagla, J.
Pidilite Industries Ltd. – Petitioner
versus
Premier Stationery Industries
Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – Respondents
Contempt Petition (L) No.28560 of 2021 in
Com Suit No.520 of 2017
Decided on 13.8.2024

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Hiren Kamod, Nishad Nadkarni, Aasif Navodia, Khushboo Jhunjhunwala, Jaanvi Chopra and Rakshita Singh i/b. Khaitan and Co.
For the Respondent Nos.1 to 4:Aseem Naphade, Pooja Yadav, Sonali Bhosale, J.V. Bhosale and Akshay Dunde, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINT
Scope of execution proceedings are irrelevant for contempt jurisdiction of High Court.

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order XXXIX Rule 2A – Contempt Petition – Breach of injunction – Scope of execution proceedings are irrelevant for contempt jurisdiction of this Court – Court’s power to punish for contempt under Article 215 of Constitution of India r/w Contempt of Courts Act r/w Section 151 of CPC, is not only wider than, but is also independent of any rights of parties inter se in any execution proceeding – Respondents have committed willful contumacious contempt of this Court, it would be necessary for Respondents to purge their contempt by penalizing them rather than their being punished by civil imprisonment – Respondents shall jointly and / or severally pay to Petitioner amount of Rs.50,00,000/- – Failure on part of Respondents to comply with this Order would result in Respondents being detained for a period of two weeks in Civil Prison – Respondents restrained by perpetual order from infringing in any manner Petitioner’s copyright in artistic work. (Paras 42, 47, 49 and 50)

Result: Contempt Petition disposed of.

ORDER

The present Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (original Defendants in Commercial Suit No. 520 of 2017) as well as Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, for wilful and deliberate disregard, disobedience, disrespect, noncompliance and violation of the order dated 13 July 2017 passed in the above matter by this Hon’ble Court in the above Suit (“Final Order”) in terms of consent terms dated 13 July 2017 (“Consent Terms”) and undertakings contained therein (which were accepted as undertakings to the Hon’ble Court). The Petitioner claims that the Respondents, in blatant breach of the Final Order and Consent Terms, are using the impugned label/trade dress including impugned bottles and glue pens (as set out at Exhibit D-1, page 295 of the Petition), that continue to be in violation of the rights of the Petitioner including its rights in the FEVICOL MR Artistic Work, Distinctive FEVICOL MR Bottle and the FEVICOL MR Glue Pens, as more particularly set out in the Contempt Petition.

2. The Petitioner claims to be a world-renowned company in the field of adhesives and sealants, construction and paint chemicals, automotive chemicals, art materials, industrial adhesives, industrial and textile resins and organic pigments and preparations since atleast 1969. The Petitioner’s aforesaid products are sold under well known trademarks including FEVICOL, FEVICRYL, FEVISTIK, FEVI KWIK, M-SEAL, DR. FIXIT, FEVI BOND, FEVIGUM, FEVITITE, etc. Most of the Petitioner’s products have been developed through strong in-house research and development. The products emanating from the Petitioner and sold under its well-known and famous brands are internationally known for their superior and high quality and technical excellence.

3. On 21 April 2017, the Petitioner had filed the above Suit against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to claim reliefs in respect of infringement of the Petitioner’s well known FEVICOL MR Artistic Works (as defined therein) and the Petitioner’s copyrights in the FEVICOL MR Artistic Work (as defined therein), violation of the Petitioner’s design in the Distinctive FEVICOL MR Bottle (as defined therein), violation of the Petitioner’s rights in the Distinctive FEVICOL MR Glue Pens (as defined therein) and the tort of passing off in the circumstances explained in the plaint, which has been annexed to the petition at Exhibit A (Pages 44-274 of the Petition). (Paragraph 1, page 3 of the Petition) 4. Simultaneously along with the Suit, the Petitioner had also filed a Notice of Motion bearing no. 439 of 2017 in the Suit, seeking ad-interim and interim reliefs, as set out therein. Vide an exparte ad-interim order dated 28 April 2017 passed by this Hon’ble Court, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 had been injuncted in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (f) of the Notice of Motion. A copy of order dated 28 April 2017 is annexed at Exhibit B to the Petition at pages 275 to 281. The above suit was disposed off by an order dated 13 July 2017 passed in the above matter in terms of consent terms dated 13 July 2017. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 had submitted to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) to the plaint and had provided undertakings in the said Consent Terms which were accepted as undertakings to the Hon’ble Court. A copy of the Final Order and Consent Terms dated 13 July 2017 are annexed to the Petition at Exhibit C, pages 282-294. (Paragraphs 1 and 2, pages 3-4 of the Petition)

5. The above Suit was decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) which are being reproduced below for ease of reference:

(a) the Defendants, its Directors, proprietors, partners, owners, servants, subordinates, representatives, stockists, dealers, agents and all other persons claiming under them be restrained by a perpetual order and injunction of this Hon’ble Court from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered mark bearing registration no. 2614770 in any manner and from using in relation to Impugned Goods

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top