SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ARINDAM SINHA, M. S. SAHOO
Sasmita Moharana – Appellant
Versus
Susen Kumar Maharana – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Suryakanta Dash, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. J. Sahoo, Senior Advocate, Mrs. K. Sahoo, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Sinha, J.—Two appeals are before us, preferred against common judgment dated 21st January, 2023 of the Family Court. The judgment was made in C.P. no.19 of 2021, civil proceeding filed by appellant for restitution and C.P. no.128 of 2021, civil proceeding filed by respondent, for dissolution of the marriage. By impugned judgment, case for restitution was dismissed and the marriage dissolved. Appellant was wife in the marriage. Mr. Dash, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant and Mr. Sahoo, learned senior advocate, for respondent.

2. Mr. Dash submits, the marriage was solemnized on 13th July, 2020. It was a negotiated marriage upon observing Hindu rites and rituals. On 25th October, 2020, to understanding of the parties regarding customary tradition for appellant visiting her paternal home, her brother took her there. The occasion was ‘Kumar Purnima’. She had left the matrimonial home on assurance by respondent and his father that after 15 days they will go to Dhenkanal, to bring her back. However, after lapse of one month they did not turn up. She accompanied by her father and other relatives came to her matrimonial home on 8th January, 2021. Her father-in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top