SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K. LAKSHMAN, P. SREE SUDHA
Esha Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sameer Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:M Sai Chandra Haas, Advocate
For the Respondent:Prudhvi Raj Mudunuri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

K. Lakshman, J.—Heard Mr. A. Sai Chandra Haas, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Mudunuri Prudhvi Raj, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. The present appeal is filed by the appellant - wife under Section - 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (for short ‘Act, 1984’) challenging the order dated 08.05.2023 in I.A. No.1096 of 2022 in FCOP No.223 of 2021 passed by learned Judge, Principal Family Court, City Civil Court at Secunderabad.

3. The respondent - husband had filed a petition vide FCOP No.223 of 2021 under Section - 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section - 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (for short ‘Act, 1984’) against the appellant - wife seeking decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between them performed on 28.12.2001. During pendency of the said FCOP, the appellant herein - wife has also filed an Interlocutory Application vide I.A. No.1096 of 2022 under Section - 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking a direction to the respondent herein to pay Rs.1,50,000/- per month towards interim maintenance till disposal of the main O.P. to her and her two minor children and Rs.25,000/- towards litigation expenses. Vide impugned order d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top