SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Yadav Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
Modukuru Kiran – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:CH Ravinder, Advocate
For the Respondent:N. Arthi and Hemanth Kumar Vemuri, Advocates

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed against the order dated 29.12.2023 in I.A.No.276 of 2022 in O.S.No.929 of 2022, passed by the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

2. Heard Sri CH. Ravinder, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Smt N. Arthi, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

3. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 herein are defendant Nos.5 and 6, respectively, respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent Nos.2 to 5 are defendant Nos.1 to 4, respectively, in the suit. For convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

4. In concise, the facts of the case required for adjudication of the present Civil Revision Petition are that the plaintiff filed the suit-OS.No.929 of 2022 seeking the relief of partition of the suit schedule property and to allot 1/3rd share to the plaintiff and also to declare the sale deed bearing document No.1991/2016, dated 07.04.2016, Certificate of Sale bearing document No.2840/2021, dated 28.04.2021, and Mortgage Deed bearing document No.3693/2016, dated 21.06.2016, as null and void.

5. Defendant No.3 alleged to have purchased the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top