SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANJEEV J. THAKER
Jyotiba Gambhirsinh Jadeja – Appellant
Versus
Lakhbirsinh Bhagwansinh Zala Through Heirs – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. DR Bhatt (165), Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

The present second appeal has been filed under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “the Code”) challenging the judgement and decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal no.31 of 2021, passed by 4th Additional District Judge, Surendranagar confirming the judgement and decree, passed in Regular Civil Suit No.56 of 2015, dated 18.11.2021, passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Surendranagar.

2. For the sake of brevity and convenience, the parties are referred to as their original status as that in the suit.

3. The brief facts arising in the present proceedings are that, the plaintiff filed Civil Suit for injunction on the ground that, the plaintiff had entered into an agreement to sell with respect to the suit property on 27.03.2004 and in view of the understanding that has been arrived at on 29.03.2011, the plaintiff was put in possession of the property and the plaintiff was orally assured that a sale deed will be executed in favour of the plaintiff. In the suit, the plaintiff has sought for a relief restraining defendants from illegally taking away the possession of the suit property and restraining the defendant no.2 from causing any hindrance, obstruc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top