SOUMEN SEN, SMITA DAS DE
Prabir Roy in place of Sukti Sanyal (since deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Amit Kumar Roy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Soumen Sen, J.—The true nature and purport of a document described as a Will of one Smt. Meghamala Roy (hereinafter referred to as a “testatrix’’) is the issue to be decided in this appeal. The appellant, Sukti Sanyal is the executrix of the last Will and testament of the testatrix. The appellant was appointed as one of the members of the Advisory Committee by the testatrix in the said Will. Prabir Roy was another member of the Advisory Committee.
2. In view of the death of Smt. Sukti Sanyal during the pendency of the appeal, Prabir Roy was substituted in her place by the order dated 2nd September 2024 rejecting the objection of the respondents inter alia on the following reasoning:—
“5. This Court has carefully considered the rival submissions advanced by the parties. This Court is of the clear and unequivocal view that the applicant Probir Roy before this Court is but a member of a proposed committee who was to act as an advisor to the Trust created by the settler/husband of the testatrix. The applicant before this Court is only coming on record to pursue the appeal to ensure that the interest of the beneficiary of the trust created by the husband of the testatrix is d
Mahesh Dattatray Tirthankara vs. State of Maharashtra
Mathai Samuel and Ors. vs. Eapen Eapen (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors.
S. Rathinam vs. L.S. Mariappan
Sri Mahalinga Thambiran Swamigal vs. His Holiness Srila Kasibasi Arulnandi Thambiran Swamigal
Uma Charan Bose vs. Rakhal Das Ray
Rama Dutta and Ors. vs. Atanu Dutta
Leela Rajagopal vs. Kamala Menon Cocharan
H. Venkatachala v. B.N. Thimmajamma
Bharpur Singh v. Shamsher Singh
Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and Anr.
Tarapada Das vs. Bimal Kumar Das
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.