ROHIT W. JOSHI
Ashwini Trading Co. – Appellant
Versus
Housing Bank Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The present petition takes exception to order dated 4th April, 2024 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Aurangabad, on an Application Exhibit-230 in Commercial Suit No.12/2019, thereby ordering transfer of the said suit to Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad (hereinafter referred to as “DRT, Aurangabad”).
2. A Company, named HDFC Limited had filed a suit, being Special Civil Suit No.46/2007 for recovery of amount of Rs.3,14,85,223/- against the petitioner and respondent nos.2 to 12. The suit is pertaining to recovery of amount advanced in two separate loan accounts. The outstanding amount in two loan accounts as per respondent no.1/plaintiff was Rs.2,32,28,013/- and Rs.82,62,210/- as on the date of filing of suit. After commencement of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the said suit was transferred to Commercial Court and was registered as Commercial Suit No.12/2019. Pending the said suit, HDFC Limited came to be amalgamated with HDFC Bank Limited, vide order dated 17th March, 2023 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai (NCLT, Mumbai) in Company Scheme Petition No.240/2022, granting approval to the scheme of amalgamation. HDFC Bank Limited is a Banking Company
Allahabad Bank vs. Canara Bank and Anr.
State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Vs. Ballabh Das and Co.
Bank of India Vs. Ramniklal Kapadia
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh Vs. Jai Prakash University and others
Harshad Chiman Lal Modi Vs. DLF Universal Ltd. and Anr.
Allahabad Bank Vs. Canara Bank and another
United Bank of India, Calcutta Vs. Abhijit Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd., and others
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited Vs. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.